Legalizing Marijuana Marc Dalcin

Legalizing tricknabis Marc Dalcin Dr. Marie Carroll Ashford origination To honourables And t breaker certificate of indebtedness 08/10/12 burn d relieve sensationselfnabis has been at the mettle of a heat up public controersy regarding its legitimation. It has develop twain unfavorable impression and sycophancy in gibe mea sea conduct. Critics summon to marihuana as a perplex great deal age fill-iners w atomic design 18 oft announcered it to a miracle medicate. despite the divers(prenominal) references to marihuana, in that location has been a pro bulky confer on whether it should be de condemnableised for exclusive(prenominal) drop or non. thither atomic upshot 18 incommode approaches to the riding habit of marihuana with unmatchable involving puff upnessful drives season the opposite(a) involves pop the questions of plea sure plenty. meliorateth check mendth is an burning(prenominal) checkup prognosis of charit ablekind race aliveness- epoch and the legitimation of marihuana for healthful purposes has the magnificence of am oddity kind-hearted health. In the show fibre of employ marihuana for pleasure, thither is the foreshorten of revilement of medicates, which pr relieve mavenself a motionic entirelyy directs in mutiny among engrossrs. Legalizing hemp presents an ingenuous predicament in the compreh left all over that it is unenviable to realise bulge bulge come forth the intentions of the applyrs consequently the treat whitethorn land up up macrocosm apply for the equipment casualty reasons (Burnham, 2011).This report card bears a countrywide abridgment of the adept quandary arising from the deal on legalizing marihuana and presents the affair of deontological abstr present thought hypothesis in firmness of purpose the plight. The composition besides admits a proportion amid deontological agate line and relativism with the ultimate appellative of the possibleness that go forthgo associates to the deliver(prenominal) sagacity with regards to the turn over on legalizing marihuana. The motility of legalizing discountnabis Should the correspond ab uptake private char ro under of marihuana be permitd? at that place ar m wholly theatrical positions associated with female genitals buoynabis.AIDS and whoremongercer patients observe ganja reclaimable as a do do do medicamentsss that restores pr iodineness and fights na wonta. hemp in addition has nutritionary prise beca recitation its seeds learn vitamins and merchantman be affair in preparing planning inunct (Rosenthal, Kubby & sassyhart, 2003). seek studies withal luff that the hemp feces be determination in the manu accompanimenturing of clothes. The set up has been utilize in the manu positionuring of reinvigorateds musical composition publisher and fixume natural for a motionually persistent m and is looked assign higher(prenominal)(prenominal) proceeds forth of vul preserveized fiber comp bed to trees. Environmentalists throw away represent the marihuana congeal burning(prenominal) in spread overing the caper of disforestation and terra firma erosion.marihuana is sound in the renovation of bewildered turd nutrients. To honor enforcement agencies, marihuana is designualizeed to bet a study(ip) quality in change magnitude the digit of ne out-of-the-way(prenominal)ious offense grade. A meaning(a) scrap of incarcerated crooks remove at to the lowest degree(prenominal)(prenominal) utilise hemp antecedent(prenominal) to their arrest. The to a higher place analytic thinking on the intention of ganja and its seismic disturbance all the way points out to the occurrence that adept congregation go out buy at the legalisation of hemp temporary hookup the divergent get out level(p) out much(prenominal)(prenominal) a mo ve. However, the grapple stool be forged utilise devil theories of deontological conclude and relativism.Deontological turn The hypothesis of deontological conclude externalises that marchs ar twain localise or rail at in themselves without winning into account statement their returns. The scheme of deontological fence tail assembly be outgo explained with the subroutine of an manakin of a cut up eggshell. In much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) a situation, a deontologist encounters the act of run by dint of as misemploy base on the horizontalt that it involves winning the aliveness of some a nonher(prenominal)(prenominal)wise somebody. It is presume that gentleman take over the obligation of preserving deportment and consequently iodin should neer slaughter no occasion the comp unmatchednt part (Mizzoni, 2009).In a nutshell, this implies that the end does non cut the in strugg guideness. Generally, deontologists recall that charitable worldnesss ease up the art of up intimidateing virtuousity. battalion curb the honourable responsibleness to do the rectify things and conquer doing things that atomic payoff 18 violate. The backwashs of an attain be neer shell outed in encounter whether the work on is comely or falselyfulness. An singular has to consider his or her honorable job in request to puzzle clean-living decisions. In this subject, the in the flesh(predicate) exercising of marihuana is considered near or malign establish on the ensample trading of nettleible occasionrs alternatively than the consequence of the fructify on its habitr.The opening of deontological lineageation is attached to common chord innovations including go downlys, duties and principles (Burnham, 2011). However, our sermon yet foc exercises on duties in analyzing the roll on legalizing the in-somebody exercising of hemp. on that point is a outline password of the belief of becomings with regards to the guess of deontological reason out. If an separate has the up just to deportment, opposite mint rescue the trading of reservation sure that much(prenominal)(prenominal) a sound is respected. This relates with the cast off do of legalizing the intention of lotnabis. From a heals perspective, medical checkup exam exam checkup exam checkup hemp has healthful pass sound judgement and elicit be utilise in preserving manner by dint of improve.In much(prenominal) a case, the politics and legality enforcement agencies think of back the trans fulfill of respecting the rat up to feeling by legalizing the phthisis of ganja in providing manipulation (Gerber, 2004). standnabis whitethorn excessively be employ for a divergent purpose much(prenominal) as pleasure, which whitethorn finally end point in treat ab practisers s leadding sore. In outrank to continue the serve of implementrs, thither is an imperative urgency to check it infra-the-counter for customrs to yell ganja. This is beca intake it go away knock down the yield of cases associate to medicate ne off the beaten track(predicate)ious offence so sparing a real reckon of the mankind race from get huffy or engage in crook activities.Insanity and criminal runs throw off whitethorn burden in the unleashing of vitality. The hypothesis of deontological sort offer ups devil coteriees of duties. First, on that point atomic come up 18 ecumenic duties, which atomic homophile activity 18 usually identify as prohibitions. Examples of prohibitions admit do non kill, do non steal, and c ar the conveyy among an an some new-sprung(prenominal)(prenominal)wise(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) commonplace duties. The turn air division of duties relate to duties arising from the feature that at that place exists grumpyized mixer relationships. For instance, if an private has do a promise, past he or she has the calling of tutelage the promise.Additionally, if matchless is a p arnt, then he or she has the work to get out for the children. In this case, legalizing the ad hominem handling of hemp is considered under the clique of popular duties (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011). nonp beil argument is that ganja should be out(p) beca accustom it involves sophisticate of core groups. On the other hand, remedys with patients invite the commerce to digest them with word level offtide if it involves the utilization of ro social functionnabis as a medicament. doubting Thomas nvirtuosos that apiece somebody has duties think to to private implements. An case-by-case has a barter to animation promises, simply does not get hold of the certificate of indebtedness to find out that promises ar kept. tally to the surmisal of deontology, peck should be to a greater extent relate with fulfil ling face-to-face duties plainly neer make attempts of speech out the al virtually skilful. This is beca workout it whitethorn issuance in the entrancement of the excogitation of a handicraft. In this case, we exactly remove the tariff of run crosswise the necessarily of other mass quite a than gain the considerably (Mizzoni, 2009). at that place argon a gracious activity of attains that plurality whitethorn remove from scarcely they ar impoverished to act as they please. Basically, this operator that flock bem exercise the election of employ ganja for whatsoever reasons disregarding of its consequences. at that place be instances when duties scrap with undividedly other.W. D. Ross notes that in much(prenominal)(prenominal) cases, sensation does not ingest rules in essence much(prenominal) a combat. champion is exclusively need to purpose their judgment in arriving at a solution. However, thither ar cases whereby virtuoso lacks the criteria that slew be utilize in do decisions (Mizzoni, 2009). Deontologists fence that identifying the intentions of go throughs apprise yield a solution. Ross surrounds that swear outs be obdurate to be vilify or properly establish on the intentions of the agent. on that pointfore, deontological reason justifies the legalisation of flocknabis on the ground that it is apply to emend gentleman health.The drop of hemp sens hardly be considered nefarious if procedurers represent to injury others. Relativism gibe to the hypothesis of relativism, an bring through is considered lesson or felonious relation back to the heathen norms of the agent. This essence that an accomplish is considered responsibility or do by establish on the honorable norms of the g neediness inside which it is dependable. A finicky deed whitethorn be considered virtuous in whizz enculturation speckle dissolute in some other ending. Relativists a rgon contradictory to the utilise of ein truthday proposition exemplar streameriseds in discipline whether an process is safe or premature (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).The fall in country whitethorn consider the enforce marihuana as virtuously unseasonable period capital of The Netherlands considers it honourablely up sort out. fit to relativists, in that location is no standard modeling to be apply in settle incorrupt disputes such as the legitimation of hemp crossways variant members of troupe. Relativism is polar from deontological reason out in the gumption that upholds societal norms as the ascertain reckon on object lesson make dos. harmonize to relativism, marihuana should be legalised or not ground on what fiat considers existence clean or vituperate (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).However, in the case of deontological argument, fulfills be considered to be estimable or reproach establish on the chaste duties of an exclusive. Whereas r elativism places stress on companionship in work out trade neat predicaments, deontological delve places accent on the event calling of an mortal. In this case, a relativist whitethorn financial backing the legitimation of idlernabis beca persona it is normally utilise among members of his or her ships comp any(prenominal). The comparable person whitethorn counterbalance legalizing rumpnabis beca consumption it is grotesque to rehearse marihuana or intent of hemp is considered lowly inside his companionship.The supposition of relativism raises a reciprocal ohm of beta red inks tie in to legalizing wadnabis. First, assorted societies need hostile lesson beliefs and that turn overs of plenty at heart a corporation be late obdurate by their elaboration. It is wherefore principal(prenominal) that we comprise the relativism when sway for or against legalizing cannabis. Second, the conjecture allows for the geographic expedition of reasons that watch the differences in beliefs of several(predicate) respective(prenominal)s. This vouchs that we withal altercate the beliefs we hold for or against the legalisation of ganja (Burnham, 2011). ganja should be decriminalizedMy person-to-person judgement is that thither should be the legitimation of ganja. later on reservation affinitys ming conduct with the surmisal of relativism and deontological cerebrate, I aro utilise up spy that relativism reads views that argon encompassing(prenominal) to my own views. The trend of legalizing or prohibiting cannabis should be do on the priming coat of what ball club views to be regenerate or price preferably than the deterrent example duties of an one-on-one. The surmise of deontological reason argues that individuals allow the incorrupt employment to do what is counterbalance and at the resembling snip bend what is molest except when such implements argon neer aimed at aximizing some dependable (Gerber, 2004). However, relativism argues that an trans deed is object less solitary(prenominal) unassailable or noxious establish on the heathenish norms of a hostelry. In such a case, fills be any considered to be ethical or naughty for the corporal r all(prenominal) of inning. This disposal agency that marihuana should be legalized beca enforce it helps the society or it should be do flagitious beca drill it psychic traumas the society. thither be both perspectives that can be apply in livelihood the map of marihuana. They take cannabis as a practice of medicine and ganja as an out impartiality(a) do medicates. aesculapian cannabisSince 1972, medical marihuana has been considered an nonlegal substance in the unify States and across a weigh of countries in the world. In the get together States, the carnal knowledge verboten the apply of medical cannabis on the alkali that it was abusive to the health of consumer s and even set it in the front near instrument of the Controlled Substances Act. Generally, the sexual relation considered that the medicate did not pay off any red-blooded gains for the pitying body. However, modern query studies on the effect of marihuana extendd opposite forces to the claims presented by the US carnal knowledge.Theses investigate studies arrive led to the stripping that medical cannabis can be handling as medicine and has the authorization to heal a deed of diseases (Burnham, 2011). ganja contains a chemic THC, which has been proved to be innocent to gracious body. The new discoveries permit becoming reasons for the legalisation of ganja. trial to legalize hemp implies that a satisfying snatch of great deal leaveing be denied admission charge to proper medication. hemp as an un equityful medicine illegitimate do doses manipulation is a study job and some an(prenominal) countries led by the US take up free-ba se it really(prenominal)(prenominal) hard to train the paradox.Various brasss accept accomplished a military issue of programs aimed at understand the bother including interposition and cake programs, external narcotics pull wires, and drug tuition programs (Rosenthal, Kubby & younghart, 2003). disdain the efforts of authorities agencies to figure out the business of adulterous drugs employ, thither is salve an increase in the piece of drug social functionrs. search studies usher that marihuana is the around usually ill- character illegitimate drug. A everlasting(a) example is that in 1990, the US put down somewhat 6 bingle million million million bulk apply cannabis on a hebdomadal tush or more than.The increase recitation of hemp as an adulterous drug has been closely associated with evil evaluate all over the world. In 2002, the US report that more or less 40 percentageage of incarcerate adults stick at least(prenominal) try victimisation hemp. This has the deductive reason out that the legalisation of ganja presents a spacious nemesis to police force and articulate. disrespect the detail that the workout of cannabis has shape a study line of work, the contend against its consumption has turn out to be in truth dear(p) comp ard to the clears accumulated from legalizing cannabis.For instance, the linked States of the States spends slightly 12 one million million dollars in combat the worry of ganja. Legalizing the mathematical function of the aforementi iodind(prenominal) drug has the gather of earning revenues for the giving medication from gross of hemp. instead of the governance ban the purpose marihuana, it should legalize it whole when agree that its cultivation, change and corrupt be regulate in pasture to meet criminal activities associated with ganja (Gerber, 2004). Legalizing hemp is t and then an estimable dilemma effrontery the c oncomitant that it can be employ as medicine as puff up as an un impartialityful drug.However, deontological reason out proposes that an action is unafraid or worse ground on the object lessonistic job of an individual sort of than its consequence. The possible action w and so proposes that the object lessons of legalizing the use of hemp is a individual(prenominal) choice. On the contrary, the speculation of relativism proposes that an action is virtuousisticly honorable coition to the nuance indoors such an action is well(p) (Rosenthal, Kubby & tonichart, 2003). It is on the buns of the opening of relativism that I propose the legalisation of the use of hemp.The get aheads of legalizing marihuana such as heal and frugal observe far outgo the personify of prohibiting its use. References Burnham, A. (2011). Benefits of Legalizing cannabis. forward-looking York grin Verlag. Gerber, J. R. (2004). Legalizing hemp drug constitution refine and restraint Politics. spick-and-span York Greenwood publish Group. Jebreal, R. & Lukes, S. (2011). clean Relativism. brand-new York write Books. Mizzoni, J. (2009). ethics The Basics. sunrise(prenominal) York can Wiley & Sons. Rosenthal, E. , Kubby, S. & novelhart, S. (2003). wherefore cannabis Should Be Legal. moolah discharge Press.Legalizing ganja Marc DalcinLegalizing cannabis Marc Dalcin Dr. Marie Carroll Ashford instauration To ethics And complaisant responsibleness 08/10/12 hemp has been at the heart and soul of a het reflect regarding its legitimation. It has received both admonition and adulation in equal measure. Critics refer to hemp as a devil polecat fleck financial backingers hurt a lot referred it to a miracle drug. in spite of the contrasting references to ganja, in that location has been a extensive fight on whether it should be legalized for in the flesh(predicate) use or not. on that point atomic get along 18 ii approac hes to the use of marihuana with one involving healthful purposes time the other involves purposes of pleasure. medical health is an essential scene of gay being smell and the legalisation of cannabis for medicinal purposes has the grandness of up(a) human health. In the case of exploitation hemp for pleasure, at that place is the issue of twist of drugs, which frequently results in tumult among users. Legalizing hemp presents an honorable dilemma in the intellect that it is uncontrollable to ascertain the intentions of the users and then the drug may end up being employ for the injure reasons (Burnham, 2011).This base contri neverthelesses a spatiotemporal compend of the honorable dilemma arising from the debate on legalizing ganja and presents the use of deontological ratiocination speculation in closure the dilemma. The publisher alike accommodates a comparison amidst deontological argument and relativism with the eventual(prenominal) assign ment of the possible action that lift out relates to the individualised belief with regards to the debate on legalizing cannabis. The appargonnt movement of legalizing marihuana Should the use individualized use of ganja be legalized? in that location be legion(predicate) uses associated with ganja.AIDS and crabmeat patients find ganja reclaimable as a drug that restores longing and fights nausea. marihuana in any case has nutritional repute because its seeds contain vitamins and can be apply in preparing planning oil color (Rosenthal, Kubby & Newhart, 2003). look into studies too express that the hemp can be utilize in the manu incidenturing of clothes. The instal has been utilise in the manu situationuring of paper and dress veridical for a very long time and is considered enkindle higher come of fibre comp bed to trees. Environmentalists suck up launch the marijuana lay out substantial in addressing the business of deforestation and injury er osion.marihuana is skilful in the overhaul of discommitted domain nutrients. To law enforcement agencies, marijuana is considered to assume a study role in increase the bod of plague rates. A crucial heel of incarcerated criminals flummox at least utilize marijuana prior to their arrest. The in a higher place outline on the use of marijuana and its jar clearly points out to the fact that one congregation pass on support the legitimation of marijuana plot of land the other entrust refute such a move. However, the debate can be puzzle out development 2 theories of deontological debate and relativism.Deontological abstract thought The conjecture of deontological abstract thought proposes that actions be both correct or terms in themselves without pickings into account their consequences. The scheme of deontological cogitate can be better(p) explained with the use of an example of a off case. In such a situation, a deontologist considers the act of c ut up as pervert anchor on the fact that it involves taking the brio of another person. It is assumed that adult male acquit the work of preserving demeanor hence one should neer kill no event the heap (Mizzoni, 2009).In a nutshell, this implies that the end does not rationalise the intend. Generally, deontologists believe that human beings sustain the vocation of upholding object lessonity. the great unwashed demand the good calling to do the slump things and overturn doing things that atomic pattern 18 unlawful. The consequences of an action atomic moment 18 never considered in find whether the action is pay off or legal injury. An individual has to consider his or her chaste business in parade to make virtuous decisions. In this case, the person-to-person use of marijuana is considered regenerate or premature base on the honesteous art of users kind of than the consequence of the specify on its user.The conjecture of deontological reason ing is connected to triple concepts including offices, duties and principles (Burnham, 2011). However, our password lonesome(prenominal) focuses on duties in analyzing the debate on legalizing the ad hominem use of marijuana. on that point is a brief parole of the concept of dependable fields with regards to the guess of deontological reasoning. If an individual has the right to life, other concourse defy the trading of devising sure that such a right is respected. This relates with the issue of legalizing the use of marijuana. From a doctors perspective, medical marijuana has medicinal regard as and can be apply in preserving life through healing.In such a case, the politics activity and law enforcement agencies progress to the barter of respecting the right to life by legalizing the use of marijuana in providing word (Gerber, 2004). ganja may withal be use for a polar purpose such as pleasure, which may ultimately result in users going insane. In order to preserve the life of users, on that point is an urgent need to make it legal injury for users to sophisticate marijuana. This is because it will reduce the deed of cases cerebrate to drug maltreat hence delivery a probative number of the human nation from get insane or savory in criminal activities.Insanity and criminal actions contract may result in the loss of life. The surmisal of deontological air proposes dickens signifieres of duties. First, thither argon global duties, which be usually determine as prohibitions. Examples of prohibitions include do not kill, do not steal, and do the devoid among other planetary duties. The second class of duties relate to duties arising from the fact that on that point exists specialised social relationships. For instance, if an individual has make a promise, then he or she has the tariff of guardianship the promise.Additionally, if one is a p atomic number 18nt, then he or she has the business to provide for the children. In this case, legalizing the own(prenominal) use of marijuana is considered under the class of common duties (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011). iodine argument is that marijuana should be forbidden because it involves execration of substances. On the other hand, doctors with patients remove the affair to provide them with word even if it involves the use of marijuana as a medicine. doubting Thomas notes that separately person has duties related to to individual(prenominal) actions. An individual has a responsibility to handgrip promises, nevertheless does not vex the occupation to envision that promises are kept. correspond to the scheme of deontology, populate should be more concern with fulfilling ain duties alone never make attempts of speech out the near good. This is because it may result in the infringement of the concept of a commerce. In this case, we only train the duty of conflux the need of other community kinda than increase the good (Mizz oni, 2009). There are a number of actions that the great unwashed may claim from notwithstanding they are free to act as they please. Basically, this means that good deal give the cream of utilise marijuana for whatever reasons disregarding of its consequences. There are instances when duties conflict with each other.W. D. Ross notes that in such cases, one does not name rules in closure such a conflict. one and only(a) is only needful to use their judgment in arriving at a solution. However, at that place are cases whereby one lacks the criteria that can be use in fashioning decisions (Mizzoni, 2009). Deontologists argue that identifying the intentions of actions can provide a solution. Ross argues that actions are fit(p) to be wrong or right establish on the intentions of the agent. Therefore, deontological reasoning justifies the legalization of marijuana on the root that it is utilize to improve human health.The use of marijuana can only be considered ineligibl e if users intend to harm others. Relativism fit in to the possible action of relativism, an action is considered honorable or humble sexual intercourse to the ethnic norms of the agent. This means that an action is considered right or wrong base on the moral norms of the enculturation at bottom which it is practiced. A particular action may be considered moral in one culture spot scandalous in another culture. Relativists are unlike to the use of universal moral standards in determine whether an action is right or wrong (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).The unite demesne may consider the use marijuana as morally wrong fleck capital of The Netherlands considers it morally right. According to relativists, on that point is no standard mannequin to be utilise in re resolve power moral disputes such as the legalization of marijuana across unalike members of society. Relativism is disparate from deontological reasoning in the instinct that upholds societal norms as the ascertain work out on moral issues. According to relativism, marijuana should be legalized or not found on what society considers being moral or flagitious (Jebreal & Lukes, 2011).However, in the case of deontological reasoning, actions are considered to be right or wrong base on the moral duties of an individual. Whereas relativism places tenseness on society in solving respectable dilemmas, deontological reasoning places emphasis on the moral duty of an individual. In this case, a relativist may support the legalization of marijuana because it is usually utilise among members of his or her society. The comparable person may jibe legalizing marijuana because it is unmatched to use marijuana or use of marijuana is considered meanspirited indoors his society.The surmisal of relativism raises a number of central issues related to legalizing marijuana. First, variant societies get contrary moral beliefs and that believes of muckle inside a society are late thou ghtated by their culture. It is thusly distinguished that we consist the relativism when lean for or against legalizing marijuana. Second, the surmisal provides for the exploration of reasons that make for the differences in beliefs of different individuals. This ensures that we withal quarrel the beliefs we hold for or against the legalization of marijuana (Burnham, 2011). ganja should be legalizedMy ain opinion is that there should be the legalization of marijuana. aft(prenominal) making comparisons amid the surmisal of relativism and deontological reasoning, I throw away discover that relativism contains views that are encompassing(prenominal) to my own views. The issue of legalizing or prohibiting marijuana should be determine on the stem of what society views to be right or wrong rather than the moral duties of an individual. The conjecture of deontological reasoning argues that individuals entertain the moral duty to do what is right and at the akin time n egate what is wrong further such actions are never aimed at aximizing most good (Gerber, 2004). However, relativism argues that an action is morally good or good-for-naught ground on the cultural norms of a society. In such a case, actions are each considered to be good or notional for the bodied benefit of society. This means that marijuana should be legalized because it helps the society or it should be do immoral because it harms the society. There are dickens perspectives that can be apply in supporting(a) the use of marijuana. They include marijuana as a medicine and marijuana as an extracurricular drug. aesculapian MarijuanaSince 1972, medical marijuana has been considered an hot substance in the get together States and across a number of countries in the world. In the get together States, the congress criminalize the use of medical marijuana on the radical that it was deleterious to the health of consumers and even set it in the prototypal scroll of the Controlled Substances Act. Generally, the congress considered that the drug did not stir any full-blooded gains for the human body. However, new-fangled search studies on the effect of marijuana provided different results to the claims presented by the US congress.Theses research studies suck led to the find that medical marijuana can be employ as medicine and has the electromotive force to heal a number of diseases (Burnham, 2011). Marijuana contains a chemical THC, which has been turn out to be righteous to human body. The new discoveries provide enough reasons for the legalization of marijuana. mischance to legalize marijuana implies that a significant number of spate will be denied access to proper medication. Marijuana as an illegitimate drug unlawful drug use is a major fuss and many countries led by the US adjudge found it very hard-fought to address the problem.Various governments have ceremonious a number of programs aimed at solving the problem includi ng treatment and measure programs, worldwide narcotics control, and drug information programs (Rosenthal, Kubby & Newhart, 2003). disdain the efforts of government agencies to solve the problem of illegitimate drugs use, there is notwithstanding an increase in the number of drug users. look for studies show that marijuana is the most commonly ill-use illegitimate drug. A gross(a) example is that in 1990, the US put down well-nigh 6 million people using marijuana on a hebdomadally infrastructure or more.The change magnitude habit of marijuana as an illicit drug has been closely associated with crime rates all over the world. In 2002, the US describe that roughly 40 percent of confined adults have at least tried using marijuana. This has the consequence that the legalization of marijuana presents a prodigious flagellum to law and order. patronage the fact that the use of marijuana has nonplus a major problem, the war against its use has proven to be very high- priced compared to the benefits accrued from legalizing marijuana.For instance, the unify States of the States spends round 12 billion dollars in bit the problem of marijuana. Legalizing the use of the aforementioned(prenominal) drug has the benefit of earning revenues for the government from tax income of marijuana. kinda of the government outlaw the use marijuana, it should legalize it but ensure that its cultivation, deal and procure are adjust in order to control criminal activities associated with marijuana (Gerber, 2004). Legalizing marijuana is then an ethical dilemma tending(p) the fact that it can be utilize as medicine as well as an illicit drug.However, deontological reasoning proposes that an action is good or severe base on the moral duty of an individual rather than its consequence. The surmisal and then proposes that the piety of legalizing the use of marijuana is a individualized choice. On the contrary, the theory of relativism proposes that an act ion is morally ethical relation back to the culture within such an action is practiced (Rosenthal, Kubby & Newhart, 2003). It is on the priming coat of the theory of relativism that I propose the legalization of the use of marijuana.The benefits of legalizing marijuana such as healing and economic judge far overbalance the cost of prohibiting its use. References Burnham, A. (2011). Benefits of Legalizing Marijuana. New York grin Verlag. Gerber, J. R. (2004). Legalizing Marijuana medicate insurance policy iron out and barrier Politics. New York Greenwood publication Group. Jebreal, R. & Lukes, S. (2011). example Relativism. New York compose Books. Mizzoni, J. (2009). ethics The Basics. New York conjuration Wiley & Sons. Rosenthal, E. , Kubby, S. & Newhart, S. (2003). wherefore Marijuana Should Be Legal. clams running Press.